| 1 |
♠J
♥AK82
♦A975432
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 3♠* E -3 ♣A 3-Llacera-Xu vs 5-Pender-Kobland
130 0.50 1.50 3♦ N +1 ♠K 2-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 4-Davidson-Gamble
130 0.50 1.50 3♦ N +1 ♠K 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Sedey-Wesolowski
|
| 2 |
♠KJ74
♥97
♦T72
♣A762
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♥K 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Sedey-Wesolowski
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥K 2-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 4-Davidson-Gamble
150 0.00 2.00 1N S +2 ♥K 3-Llacera-Xu vs 5-Pender-Kobland
|
| 3 |
♠JT4
♥9
♦KJ976
♣J632
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 6♥ W -1 ♠J 3-Llacera-Xu vs 5-Pender-Kobland
170 0.50 1.50 2♠ E +2 ♣9 2-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 4-Davidson-Gamble
170 0.50 1.50 3♥ W +1 ♦7 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Sedey-Wesolowski
|
| 4 |
♠KJT6
♥-
♦Q8764
♣QJ72
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♦ 5♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: -/1♣ 1♥ ♣6/7 ♦2 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♥2 3-Llacera-Xu vs 5-Pender-Kobland
300 1.00 1.00 3♣ W -3 ♠6 2-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 4-Davidson-Gamble
200 0.00 2.00 2♠ S +3 ♦5 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Sedey-Wesolowski
|
| 5 |
♠QJ84
♥A8
♦QT986
♣87
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♥ 2/1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ W ♣8 5-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Sedey-Wesolowski
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ W +1 ♦T 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 2-Ruggeri-Schilling
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♠Q 3-Llacera-Xu vs 4-Davidson-Gamble
|
| 6 |
♠Q64
♥A87
♦AQ643
♣AJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦6/5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2/3♥ -/1♠ 1/2NT ♠5/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♣ E -1 ♦7 3-Llacera-Xu vs 4-Davidson-Gamble
350 1.00 1.00 3N N -7 ♣K 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 2-Ruggeri-Schilling
710 0.00 2.00 4♣* E ♠9 5-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Sedey-Wesolowski
|
| 7 |
♠KQ93
♥9
♦K965
♣A543
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 1N S +2 ♣9 3-Llacera-Xu vs 4-Davidson-Gamble
150 1.50 0.50 1N N +2 ♣Q 5-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Sedey-Wesolowski
120 0.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♣9 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 2-Ruggeri-Schilling
|
| 8 |
♠AJ85
♥T983
♦65
♣754
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♥ -/1♠ 1NT ♦5 ♠6/7 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣J 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 2-Ruggeri-Schilling
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ N ♣3 3-Llacera-Xu vs 4-Davidson-Gamble
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ S +2 ♦5 5-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Sedey-Wesolowski
|
| 9 |
♠5
♥KQ6
♦QJ6
♣AQJ842
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: -/1♦ 5♥ 3♠ -/1NT ♣4 ♦6/7 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 5♣* N -2 ♠A 1-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 2-Ruggeri-Schilling
500 0.50 1.50 5♣* N -3 ♠A 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 3-Llacera-Xu
500 0.50 1.50 5♣* N -3 ♠8 4-Davidson-Gamble vs 5-Pender-Kobland
|
| 10 |
♠QT9872
♥J
♦K9
♣J432
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 ♣Q 1-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 2-Ruggeri-Schilling
130 0.50 1.50 4♣ W ♠5 4-Davidson-Gamble vs 5-Pender-Kobland
130 0.50 1.50 3♣ W +1 ♥J 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 3-Llacera-Xu
|
| 11 |
♠K63
♥Q5
♦K9
♣KQJ983
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠4/3 NT5 |
| EW: 4♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♣ N +1 ♥6 1-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 2-Ruggeri-Schilling
90 1.00 1.00 2♣ N ♥6 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 3-Llacera-Xu
50 0.00 2.00 3♣ N -1 ♥6 4-Davidson-Gamble vs 5-Pender-Kobland
|
| 12 |
♠J94
♥AQJ92
♦85
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 2♦ 4♠ -/1NT ♥6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 2♦ E ♣5 4-Davidson-Gamble vs 5-Pender-Kobland
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ E +2 ♣T 1-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 2-Ruggeri-Schilling
200 0.00 2.00 2♥* N -1 ♦4 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 3-Llacera-Xu
|
| 13 |
♠KQ6
♥3
♦T64
♣JT9543
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N W ♣J 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Davidson-Gamble
120 1.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♣J 5-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Ruggeri-Schilling
200 0.00 2.00 1♥ S -2 ♣8 1-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 3-Llacera-Xu
|
| 14 |
♠T92
♥A86
♦52
♣AQ654
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4/3♣ 1♦ 3/2♥ 4♠ 4/3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥3 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Davidson-Gamble
50 1.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♠J 5-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Ruggeri-Schilling
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 ♥3 1-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 3-Llacera-Xu
|
| 15 |
♠3
♥KJ9
♦KQJ843
♣T98
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♦K 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Davidson-Gamble
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ E ♦T 5-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Ruggeri-Schilling
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ E +1 ♦T 1-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 3-Llacera-Xu
|
| 16 |
♠KJ93
♥JT9
♦AT4
♣QJ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N N ♥3 5-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Ruggeri-Schilling
100 1.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♦3 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Davidson-Gamble
50 0.00 2.00 1N S -1 ♣3 1-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 3-Llacera-Xu
|
| 17 |
♠JT752
♥Q974
♦65
♣QT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦3 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 4♣ E +2 ♦3 4-Davidson-Gamble vs 1-Sedey-Wesolowski
400 1.00 1.00 3N W ♥4 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 5-Pender-Kobland
460 0.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♥4 2-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 3-Llacera-Xu
|
| 18 |
♠54
♥KQJ94
♦K7
♣KQJ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♣2 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 5-Pender-Kobland
100 1.00 1.00 3♣ N -1 ♦Q 4-Davidson-Gamble vs 1-Sedey-Wesolowski
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ E ♦5 2-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 3-Llacera-Xu
|
| 19 |
♠AJ9
♥Q52
♦J643
♣J75
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 5♣ 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♦3 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 5-Pender-Kobland
100 1.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♦3 2-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 3-Llacera-Xu
150 0.00 2.00 3♣ E +2 ♦A 4-Davidson-Gamble vs 1-Sedey-Wesolowski
|
| 20 |
♠KT72
♥7
♦942
♣AQT72
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ E ♣5 6-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 5-Pender-Kobland
120 1.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♥3 2-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 3-Llacera-Xu
150 0.00 2.00 1N E +2 ♥3 4-Davidson-Gamble vs 1-Sedey-Wesolowski
|