| 1 |
♠74
♥AQT7652
♦84
♣Q4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦1 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 1♣ 6♦ 5♠ 5NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ W +1 ♥A 2-Spinazze-Gamble vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ E +1 ♥9 3-Murdock-Winham vs 7-Hullman-Kobland
480 1.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♥A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Harken-Harken
500 0.00 3.00 5♥* N -3 ♦K 8-Dotters-Katz vs 1-Sterling-Xu
|
| 2 |
♠7
♥AT43
♦KT754
♣T32
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥3/2 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♣ W -1 ♦4 2-Spinazze-Gamble vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
110 2.00 1.00 2♥ W ♠7 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Harken-Harken
120 1.00 2.00 2N W ♦5 8-Dotters-Katz vs 1-Sterling-Xu
150 0.00 3.00 2N E +1 ♠Q 3-Murdock-Winham vs 7-Hullman-Kobland
|
| 3 |
♠K72
♥9653
♦T73
♣KQT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 0.50 2♥ S ♦K 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Harken-Harken
110 2.50 0.50 2♥ S ♦4 2-Spinazze-Gamble vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 8-Dotters-Katz vs 1-Sterling-Xu
110 0.00 3.00 3♦ W ♥3 3-Murdock-Winham vs 7-Hullman-Kobland
|
| 4 |
♠A7
♥QJT
♦AT82
♣QJ82
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠4 |
| EW: 3♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♥ S +1 ♣A 8-Dotters-Katz vs 2-Spinazze-Gamble
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♦7 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Sterling-Xu
140 0.50 2.50 3♠ E ♥A 3-Murdock-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ E +1 ♥A 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Hullman-Kobland
|
| 5 |
♠K975
♥KQ3
♦KT7
♣K53
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.00 0.00 2N N +2 ♦5 8-Dotters-Katz vs 2-Spinazze-Gamble
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ N ♥6 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Sterling-Xu
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ N ♦5 3-Murdock-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♠8 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Hullman-Kobland
|
| 6 |
♠Q763
♥T5
♦J7
♣A9842
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 NT5 |
| EW: 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♠ S -1 ♣7 3-Murdock-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ W +1 ♦J 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Hullman-Kobland
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ W +1 ♦7 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Sterling-Xu
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ W ♦J 8-Dotters-Katz vs 2-Spinazze-Gamble
|
| 7 |
♠Q876
♥T
♦JT742
♣QJ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 2NT ♣3 ♦6/5 ♠4 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ S ♦9 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Harken-Harken
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♦3 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Spinazze-Gamble
100 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♦9 7-Hullman-Kobland vs 1-Sterling-Xu
100 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♦9 8-Dotters-Katz vs 3-Murdock-Winham
|
| 8 |
♠JT95
♥2
♦74
♣AT7432
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥1 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 6♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 2♥ E +3 ♠K 7-Hullman-Kobland vs 1-Sterling-Xu
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♥2 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Harken-Harken
480 0.50 2.50 4♥ W +2 ♠J 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Spinazze-Gamble
480 0.50 2.50 4♥ W +2 ♠J 8-Dotters-Katz vs 3-Murdock-Winham
|
| 9 |
♠K98
♥T7
♦AQ974
♣Q84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♦ 1♥ 2/3NT ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.50 0.50 3♦ N +1 ♣2 8-Dotters-Katz vs 3-Murdock-Winham
130 2.50 0.50 2♦ S +2 ♣9 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Harken-Harken
110 1.00 2.00 3♦ N ♣2 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Spinazze-Gamble
50 0.00 3.00 4♦ S -1 ♠6 7-Hullman-Kobland vs 1-Sterling-Xu
|
| 10 |
♠T654
♥KQJ972
♦2
♣K2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣2 ♦2 ♠3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3/4♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 5♦ E -1 ♥A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Hullman-Kobland
100 2.50 0.50 5♦ E -1 ♥A 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Murdock-Winham
130 1.00 2.00 4♦ E ♥A 8-Dotters-Katz vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
200 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♦A 1-Sterling-Xu vs 2-Spinazze-Gamble
|
| 11 |
♠973
♥AQ2
♦A9764
♣AT
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3/4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ N ♠2 1-Sterling-Xu vs 2-Spinazze-Gamble
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♥3 8-Dotters-Katz vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♣3 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Hullman-Kobland
50 0.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♥7 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Murdock-Winham
|
| 12 |
♠6
♥QT752
♦K
♣AKQ765
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 3.00 0.00 2♦ W -5 ♦5 1-Sterling-Xu vs 2-Spinazze-Gamble
150 2.00 1.00 3♦ W -3 ♣A 8-Dotters-Katz vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ N ♥9 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Murdock-Winham
200 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♦A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Hullman-Kobland
|
| 13 |
♠KT76
♥K5
♦KQ73
♣862
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦4/5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4/5 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♥ 3/4♠ 2/3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♦7 8-Dotters-Katz vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♣A 2-Spinazze-Gamble vs 3-Murdock-Winham
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♣A 7-Hullman-Kobland vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
1400 0.00 3.00 5♣* S -5 ♥A 6-Harken-Harken vs 1-Sterling-Xu
|
| 14 |
♠KJT8
♥8632
♦975
♣98
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦1 ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
| EW: 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ W ♣9 7-Hullman-Kobland vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
450 1.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♣9 2-Spinazze-Gamble vs 3-Murdock-Winham
450 1.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♣9 6-Harken-Harken vs 1-Sterling-Xu
450 1.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♣9 8-Dotters-Katz vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 15 |
♠K43
♥853
♦T53
♣AT72
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦0 ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
| EW: 3♣ 6/7♦ 6♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 3.00 0.00 3♥ E +3 ♠T 7-Hullman-Kobland vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
430 2.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♣2 2-Spinazze-Gamble vs 3-Murdock-Winham
450 1.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♠T 6-Harken-Harken vs 1-Sterling-Xu
480 0.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♣6 8-Dotters-Katz vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 16 |
♠J43
♥QJ532
♦AJ2
♣AJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2/3NT ♣5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.00 0.00 1N* N +3 ♣5 7-Hullman-Kobland vs 2-Spinazze-Gamble
150 2.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♣2 3-Murdock-Winham vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ N +1 ♠8 8-Dotters-Katz vs 6-Harken-Harken
90 0.00 3.00 1N N ♣2 1-Sterling-Xu vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 17 |
♠QJ98
♥A963
♦A
♣QT85
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♦J 1-Sterling-Xu vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
460 2.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♦J 3-Murdock-Winham vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
460 2.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♦5 7-Hullman-Kobland vs 2-Spinazze-Gamble
430 0.00 3.00 3N N +1 ♥5 8-Dotters-Katz vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
| 18 |
♠KQ53
♥AK752
♦T
♣642
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 2♦ W -2 ♦T 7-Hullman-Kobland vs 2-Spinazze-Gamble
100 2.50 0.50 3♣ W -2 ♦T 8-Dotters-Katz vs 6-Harken-Harken
90 1.00 2.00 2♦ W ♥A 3-Murdock-Winham vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
400 0.00 3.00 3N W ♥5 1-Sterling-Xu vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 19 |
♠Q85
♥643
♦J94
♣AT84
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣5/4 ♦4 ♠5/4 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 3♥ S ♥9 2-Spinazze-Gamble vs 6-Harken-Harken
140 2.50 0.50 2♥ S +1 ♥9 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♥9 1-Sterling-Xu vs 3-Murdock-Winham
50 0.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♥9 8-Dotters-Katz vs 7-Hullman-Kobland
|
| 20 |
♠A6432
♥A97
♦87
♣J96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♣ S +1 ♦A 2-Spinazze-Gamble vs 6-Harken-Harken
90 2.00 1.00 1N E ♥Q 8-Dotters-Katz vs 7-Hullman-Kobland
120 0.50 2.50 1N E +1 ♥Q 1-Sterling-Xu vs 3-Murdock-Winham
120 0.50 2.50 1N E +1 ♥Q 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 21 |
♠AJ82
♥AK7542
♦T9
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦5 2-Spinazze-Gamble vs 6-Harken-Harken
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♦4 1-Sterling-Xu vs 3-Murdock-Winham
200 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -2 ♦4 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -2 ♣3 8-Dotters-Katz vs 7-Hullman-Kobland
|