| 1 |
♠A852
♥82
♦AQ543
♣KQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 3N N -1 ♠K 3-Hill-Xu vs 7-Wesolowski-Formoso
50 1.50 0.50 2N N -1 ♠5 8-Walker-Loops vs 1-Henderson-Gamble
470 0.00 2.00 2♠* E ♣9 2-Shoemaker-Miller vs 4-Pender-Kobland
|
| 2 |
♠KT754
♥AK
♦KJ6
♣985
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ -/1♦ 2♠ 4NT ♦6/7 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 2.00 0.00 4♥* E -4 ♠A 2-Shoemaker-Miller vs 4-Pender-Kobland
690 1.00 1.00 3N N +3 ♥5 8-Walker-Loops vs 1-Henderson-Gamble
660 0.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♥6 3-Hill-Xu vs 7-Wesolowski-Formoso
|
| 3 |
♠A8653
♥62
♦J7
♣9642
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦4/3 NT6/5 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N S ♦K 3-Hill-Xu vs 7-Wesolowski-Formoso
100 1.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♥6 2-Shoemaker-Miller vs 4-Pender-Kobland
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ W +1 ♥6 8-Walker-Loops vs 1-Henderson-Gamble
|
| 4 |
♠KQ842
♥AQJ
♦K43
♣54
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/4♣ 2/3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♥7 4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Henderson-Gamble
630 1.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♥6 6-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Wesolowski-Formoso
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥5 8-Walker-Loops vs 2-Shoemaker-Miller
|
| 5 |
♠53
♥A
♦A854
♣J97543
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 1/-♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♦ E -4 ♣T 8-Walker-Loops vs 2-Shoemaker-Miller
100 1.00 1.00 3♣ N -1 ♥3 6-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Wesolowski-Formoso
200 0.00 2.00 2♠ S -2 ♦7 4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Henderson-Gamble
|
| 6 |
♠52
♥Q6
♦AJ9762
♣T86
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♠Q 8-Walker-Loops vs 2-Shoemaker-Miller
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠6 4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Henderson-Gamble
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♠5 6-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Wesolowski-Formoso
|
| 7 |
♠862
♥KJ75
♦6
♣JT984
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦0 ♥4 ♠6 NT2 |
| EW: 6♦ 3♥ 5NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ W ♦6 7-Wesolowski-Formoso vs 1-Henderson-Gamble
620 1.00 1.00 5♦ E +1 ♦4 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Llacera-Llacera
640 0.00 2.00 5♦ E +2 ♣5 8-Walker-Loops vs 3-Hill-Xu
|
| 8 |
♠KJT7
♥T732
♦K2
♣843
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N E ♥4 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Llacera-Llacera
460 0.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♥2 7-Wesolowski-Formoso vs 1-Henderson-Gamble
460 0.50 1.50 3N E +2 ♥4 8-Walker-Loops vs 3-Hill-Xu
|
| 9 |
♠K72
♥-
♦AJT87
♣AKQJ9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♣ 7♦ 7♠ 1NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣0 ♦0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 2.00 0.00 4♠ S +3 ♣5 8-Walker-Loops vs 3-Hill-Xu
440 1.00 1.00 5♣ N +2 ♥8 7-Wesolowski-Formoso vs 1-Henderson-Gamble
50 0.00 2.00 5♠ S -1 ♥A 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 10 |
♠A2
♥A9
♦K943
♣AKQ92
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 3♦ 6♠ 6NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣0 ♦4 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 2.00 0.00 3N N +4 ♥K 6-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Hill-Xu
710 1.00 1.00 5♠ S +2 ♥5 1-Henderson-Gamble vs 2-Shoemaker-Miller
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ E -2 ♠5 8-Walker-Loops vs 4-Pender-Kobland
|
| 11 |
♠T32
♥Q84
♦AJT4
♣973
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦J 1-Henderson-Gamble vs 2-Shoemaker-Miller
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ E +1 ♠Q 8-Walker-Loops vs 4-Pender-Kobland
430 0.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♣9 6-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Hill-Xu
|
| 12 |
♠JT8
♥T7
♦AJ42
♣8743
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♠J 1-Henderson-Gamble vs 2-Shoemaker-Miller
50 1.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♠2 6-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Hill-Xu
120 0.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♥2 8-Walker-Loops vs 4-Pender-Kobland
|
| 13 |
♠QT85
♥AK653
♦6
♣T65
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♦ W -1 ♥A 6-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Henderson-Gamble
120 1.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♥5 2-Shoemaker-Miller vs 3-Hill-Xu
180 0.00 2.00 1N W +3 ♥5 7-Wesolowski-Formoso vs 4-Pender-Kobland
|
| 14 |
♠A6532
♥A4
♦KQ3
♣763
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 3♠ N -1 ♣J 2-Shoemaker-Miller vs 3-Hill-Xu
50 1.50 0.50 3♠ N -1 ♣J 6-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Henderson-Gamble
300 0.00 2.00 4♠* N -2 ♣J 7-Wesolowski-Formoso vs 4-Pender-Kobland
|
| 15 |
♠KT8643
♥-
♦AQ954
♣T2
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♦ 7♥ 6♠ 7NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 2.00 0.00 4♥ S +3 ♦J 7-Wesolowski-Formoso vs 4-Pender-Kobland
650 1.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♣J 6-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Henderson-Gamble
200 0.00 2.00 5♣ S -2 ♦J 2-Shoemaker-Miller vs 3-Hill-Xu
|
| 16 |
♠K954
♥Q942
♦K2
♣Q97
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠Q 3-Hill-Xu vs 4-Pender-Kobland
300 1.00 1.00 2♠ W -3 ♥4 8-Walker-Loops vs 6-Llacera-Llacera
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ S +2 ♦7 7-Wesolowski-Formoso vs 2-Shoemaker-Miller
|
| 17 |
♠AKQJ973
♥-
♦97
♣AK87
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 7♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥5 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 1.50 0.50 6♠ N +1 ♥A 7-Wesolowski-Formoso vs 2-Shoemaker-Miller
1010 1.50 0.50 6♠ N +1 ♣3 8-Walker-Loops vs 6-Llacera-Llacera
510 0.00 2.00 5♠ N +2 ♥A 3-Hill-Xu vs 4-Pender-Kobland
|
| 18 |
♠A62
♥AJ9753
♦KT3
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 ♦J 7-Wesolowski-Formoso vs 2-Shoemaker-Miller
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 ♣7 3-Hill-Xu vs 4-Pender-Kobland
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ W ♦3 8-Walker-Loops vs 6-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 19 |
♠AQ975
♥Q753
♦8
♣KT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♥A 1-Henderson-Gamble vs 3-Hill-Xu
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♥A 2-Shoemaker-Miller vs 6-Llacera-Llacera
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♥A 8-Walker-Loops vs 7-Wesolowski-Formoso
|
| 20 |
♠KT87
♥875
♦QJT
♣984
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 5♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ E +1 ♦3 8-Walker-Loops vs 7-Wesolowski-Formoso
200 1.00 1.00 3♣ S -2 ♠9 2-Shoemaker-Miller vs 6-Llacera-Llacera
300 0.00 2.00 4♣ S -3 ♠5 1-Henderson-Gamble vs 3-Hill-Xu
|
| 21 |
♠QJ65
♥JT4
♦762
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 5/4♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠Q 1-Henderson-Gamble vs 3-Hill-Xu
400 1.00 1.00 3N W ♠2 8-Walker-Loops vs 7-Wesolowski-Formoso
500 0.00 2.00 4♠* S -2 ♥A 2-Shoemaker-Miller vs 6-Llacera-Llacera
|