| 1 |
♠J42
♥KQ62
♦AT83
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 5♣ W -1 ♥K 2-Gassman-Loops vs 3-Kremers-Downing
50 4.50 0.50 4♣ W -1 ♥K 7-Harken-Winham vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
50 3.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♣K 6-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
90 2.00 3.00 2♣ W ♥K 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
110 1.00 4.00 2♣ W +1 ♦3 3-Barr-Barr vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
150 0.00 5.00 3♣ W +2 ♥2 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 2 |
♠95
♥97
♦K98743
♣AT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1/-♦ 2/1♥ 3/1♠ 5/4NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♦6 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
100 4.00 1.00 5♣ E -2 ♥K 2-Gassman-Loops vs 3-Kremers-Downing
100 4.00 1.00 5♣ E -2 ♥K 6-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
150 2.00 3.00 3♣ W +2 ♥9 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
170 1.00 4.00 3♠ E +1 ♥6 3-Barr-Barr vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
400 0.00 5.00 3N E ♥K 7-Harken-Winham vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
|
| 3 |
♠KJ7
♥A53
♦K52
♣Q943
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 4♦ 4NT ♥5 ♠6 |
| EW: 1/2♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♠4 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
430 4.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♠4 7-Harken-Winham vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
400 3.00 2.00 3N N ♠4 6-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
50 2.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♠6 2-Gassman-Loops vs 3-Kremers-Downing
100 0.50 4.50 5♦ S -2 ♣2 3-Barr-Barr vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
100 0.50 4.50 4♣ S -2 ♠5 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 4 |
♠J6
♥Q74
♦Q964
♣8765
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣5 6-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Kremers-Downing
100 3.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♣8 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
100 3.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♣A 7-Harken-Winham vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
100 3.00 2.00 2♦ W -1 ♣8 3-Barr-Barr vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
140 1.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 ♥8 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
170 0.00 5.00 3♥ E +1 ♣A 2-Gassman-Loops vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 5 |
♠92
♥QJ96
♦K75
♣J983
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 2♠ W -1 ♦5 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ W ♥Q 7-Harken-Winham vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ W ♥6 2-Gassman-Loops vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ W ♥6 3-Barr-Barr vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ W ♣8 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
140 0.00 5.00 2♠ W +1 ♦K 6-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Kremers-Downing
|
| 6 |
♠T92
♥J965
♦AT
♣KQT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦4 |
| EW: 3♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 5.00 0.00 4♠* S ♥T 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
120 4.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♦5 7-Harken-Winham vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
90 3.00 2.00 1N N ♥3 2-Gassman-Loops vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
PASS 1.50 3.50 Pass Out 3-Barr-Barr vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
PASS 1.50 3.50 Pass Out 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
100 0.00 5.00 3♠ S -2 ♥K 6-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Kremers-Downing
|
| 7 |
♠KQ73
♥Q94
♦KQJ
♣Q53
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 2♠ 1/2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.50 0.50 3♥ N ♣A 6-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
140 4.50 0.50 2♥ N +1 ♣A 3-Barr-Barr vs 3-Kremers-Downing
100 2.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♣6 7-Harken-Winham vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
100 2.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♣4 2-Gassman-Loops vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
100 2.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♣A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
200 0.00 5.00 4♥* N -1 ♣A 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
|
| 8 |
♠JT93
♥A5
♦6
♣KQJT74
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥4 |
| EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥T 7-Harken-Winham vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
150 4.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♥Q 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
110 2.50 2.50 3♣ N ♥T 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
110 2.50 2.50 2♣ N +1 ♥3 6-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
50 1.00 4.00 3♠ N -1 ♥T 3-Barr-Barr vs 3-Kremers-Downing
140 0.00 5.00 2♥ W +1 ♣K 2-Gassman-Loops vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 9 |
♠KJ5
♥JT
♦97
♣AKJ965
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 3♥ E +1 ♣4 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
200 4.00 1.00 3♥ E +2 ♠9 7-Harken-Winham vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ E ♣4 2-Gassman-Loops vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ E ♣3 6-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
650 0.50 4.50 4♥ E +1 ♠7 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
650 0.50 4.50 4♥ E +1 ♣3 3-Barr-Barr vs 3-Kremers-Downing
|
| 10 |
♠KQJ9
♥8
♦AK543
♣K64
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/3♦ ♣3/4 ♥1/2 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 5♥ 1♠ ♦3 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.00 0.00 4♣* E -2 ♦9 7-Harken-Winham vs 3-Kremers-Downing
130 3.50 1.50 4♦ N ♥K 3-Barr-Barr vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
130 3.50 1.50 3♦ N +1 ♥K 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
100 2.00 3.00 4♦ S -1 ♥5 6-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
200 1.00 4.00 4♦ N -2 ♣A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
650 0.00 5.00 4♥ E +1 ♦J 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 11 |
♠Q8432
♥KT75
♦43
♣J4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.50 0.50 4♥ S ♦8 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
420 4.50 0.50 4♥ N ♦6 3-Barr-Barr vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
400 2.50 2.50 3N S ♦Q 7-Harken-Winham vs 3-Kremers-Downing
400 2.50 2.50 3N S ♦8 6-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
200 1.00 4.00 2♥ S +3 ♠6 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
150 0.00 5.00 2N S +1 ♥6 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 12 |
♠AJ763
♥QJ3
♦A43
♣82
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥4/5 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♣ W +1 ♥Q 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
130 3.00 2.00 4♦ E ♠T 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
130 3.00 2.00 4♦ E ♠T 7-Harken-Winham vs 3-Kremers-Downing
130 3.00 2.00 3♣ W +1 ♥3 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
400 0.50 4.50 3N W ♠7 3-Barr-Barr vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
400 0.50 4.50 3N W ♠6 6-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 13 |
♠A9754
♥73
♦K97
♣Q65
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/-♣ 1♦ ♣7/6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1/-♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥7/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♠5 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Kremers-Downing
200 4.00 1.00 2♦ E -2 ♠6 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
100 2.00 3.00 2N E -1 ♣4 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ E -1 ♥5 2-Gassman-Loops vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
100 2.00 3.00 2♥ E -1 ♠6 7-Harken-Winham vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.00 5.00 2N N -1 ♦Q 3-Barr-Barr vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 14 |
♠7543
♥K87
♦J865
♣A3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ S ♥5 2-Gassman-Loops vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥Q 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥5 7-Harken-Winham vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♥Q 3-Barr-Barr vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
100 1.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♥Q 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Kremers-Downing
100 1.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♥Q 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 15 |
♠KT
♥AJ82
♦Q32
♣T743
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ -/1NT ♥6 ♠5 NT6/7 |
| EW: -/1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥6/7 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 1.50 2♦ S +1 ♠5 2-Gassman-Loops vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
110 3.50 1.50 3♣ S ♠Q 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Kremers-Downing
110 3.50 1.50 3♣ S ♥3 7-Harken-Winham vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
110 3.50 1.50 2♣ S +1 ♠Q 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
50 1.00 4.00 3♠ W -1 ♣3 3-Barr-Barr vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
100 0.00 5.00 2♦ S -1 ♣5 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 16 |
♠9832
♥J75
♦7654
♣73
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♦ 5♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♠ W +2 ♥J 7-Harken-Winham vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
600 4.00 1.00 3N W ♦7 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♥J 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♥5 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 3-Kremers-Downing
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣7 2-Gassman-Loops vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
660 0.00 5.00 4N W +1 ♦4 6-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
|
| 17 |
♠A8542
♥2
♦T97653
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4/3 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 5.00 0.00 4♠* W -4 ♥2 6-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
200 4.00 1.00 4♣ E -4 ♥A 7-Harken-Winham vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
150 3.00 2.00 4♠ W -3 ♥2 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
100 2.00 3.00 4♠ W -2 ♥2 2-Gassman-Loops vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
140 1.00 4.00 3♠ W ♥2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
150 0.00 5.00 5♥ S -3 ♠3 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 3-Kremers-Downing
|
| 18 |
♠T
♥AK52
♦K82
♣KJ864
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: -/2♣ 1/2♦ 3♠ ♣5/8 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♣9 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
110 3.50 1.50 2♠ E ♥J 6-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
110 3.50 1.50 2♦ W +1 ♥A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
140 1.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♥A 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 3-Kremers-Downing
140 1.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♥K 2-Gassman-Loops vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
140 1.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 ♣9 7-Harken-Winham vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 19 |
♠JT6
♥32
♦AKJT65
♣94
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♥A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
100 3.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♦A 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
100 3.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♦A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Kremers-Downing
100 3.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♦A 6-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
90 1.00 4.00 2♦ N ♣6 2-Gassman-Loops vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
50 0.00 5.00 2♠ S -1 ♦2 3-Barr-Barr vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
|
| 20 |
♠A4
♥KJ65
♦Q975
♣A83
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2/1♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♥ S -1 ♠3 3-Barr-Barr vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ E ♦A 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
170 2.50 2.50 3♠ E +1 ♦A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
170 2.50 2.50 3♠ E +1 ♦A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Kremers-Downing
200 0.50 4.50 2N N -2 ♠J 2-Gassman-Loops vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
200 0.50 4.50 4♦ N -2 ♠K 6-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 21 |
♠95432
♥K3
♦K6
♣J643
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦2 1-Nathanson-Formoso vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
600 4.00 1.00 3N S ♦5 3-Barr-Barr vs 6-Tidmore-Jean
170 3.00 2.00 2♠ S +2 ♦5 2-Gassman-Loops vs 4-Kissiah-Pinder
140 1.00 4.00 3♠ N ♦Q 6-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Emanuel-Frank
140 1.00 4.00 2♠ S +1 ♦J 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Kremers-Downing
140 1.00 4.00 2♠ N +1 ♦J 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
|