| 1 |
♠86
♥AKQ3
♦AJT3
♣874
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠5/6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 4♣ S ♠2 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Harken-Harken
50 1.38 2.63 4♠ E -1 ♥8 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.38 2.63 3♠ E -1 ♦Q 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Kobland-Hullman
50 1.38 2.63 3♠ E -1 ♦Q 10-Davidson-Loops vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 2 |
♠AK93
♥KQT652
♦8
♣A3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.25 0.75 4♥ N ♠6 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
620 3.25 0.75 4♥ N ♥3 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Kobland-Hullman
100 1.38 2.63 4♥ N -1 ♣2 10-Davidson-Loops vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
200 0.13 3.88 4♥ N -2 ♦3 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 3 |
♠K3
♥A973
♦KQ7
♣8743
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1/2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.88 0.13 3♥ E -3 ♣K 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Harken-Harken
130 2.63 1.38 3♦ S +1 ♠J 10-Davidson-Loops vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 0.75 3.25 3♦ S -1 ♣J 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
50 0.75 3.25 3♣ N -1 ♥K 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Kobland-Hullman
|
| 4 |
♠A5
♥9843
♦AT98
♣KQ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6/5 ♠4/3 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2♥ E -1 ♦3 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
90 2.63 1.38 1N S ♣7 1-Gamble-Spinazze vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.38 2.63 1N S -1 ♠T 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Hamlin-Black
200 0.13 3.88 1N S -2 ♠T 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Kobland-Hullman
|
| 5 |
♠KQ
♥Q5
♦AKT9
♣T8542
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 2♦ N +1 ♥A 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Hamlin-Black
100 2.63 1.38 1N S -1 ♥9 1-Gamble-Spinazze vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
110 1.38 2.63 2♥ E ♣A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
200 0.13 3.88 1N S -2 ♥9 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Kobland-Hullman
|
| 6 |
♠97
♥4
♦AKQJT72
♣K54
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.25 0.75 4♦ N +1 ♣T 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Hamlin-Black
150 3.25 0.75 3♦ N +2 ♠K 1-Gamble-Spinazze vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
110 1.38 2.63 3♦ N ♦9 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Kobland-Hullman
50 0.13 3.88 4♦ N -1 ♠K 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 7 |
♠AQT832
♥Q9
♦Q7
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT6 |
| EW: 4♦ 5♥ ♣4 ♠3/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 5♥ W -1 ♦Q 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
200 2.63 1.38 4♠* N -1 ♥A 2-Kobland-Hullman vs 4-Hamlin-Black
650 0.75 3.25 5♥ E ♥6 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
650 0.75 3.25 4♥ W +1 ♣A 10-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Gamble-Spinazze
|
| 8 |
♠T752
♥Q98764
♦Q
♣92
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1/-♠ ♣4/3 ♦5 ♠7/6 NT4/3 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3NT ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 2N E -3 ♦6 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
110 2.63 1.38 3♣ W ♦Q 10-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Gamble-Spinazze
120 1.38 2.63 2N E ♦6 2-Kobland-Hullman vs 4-Hamlin-Black
200 0.13 3.88 3♦ S -4 ♥T 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 9 |
♠AT6
♥A754
♦K653
♣T7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 |
| EW: 3/2♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 3♠ S ♥9 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ S ♥9 2-Kobland-Hullman vs 4-Hamlin-Black
50 1.38 2.63 4♠ S -1 ♣3 10-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Gamble-Spinazze
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -2 ♥6 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 10 |
♠-
♥J64
♦J5432
♣AQ983
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 4♠ W -2 ♦5 1-Gamble-Spinazze vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
PASS 2.63 1.38 Pass Out 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
110 1.38 2.63 2♠ E ♣T 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Hamlin-Black
140 0.13 3.88 3♠ W ♦3 10-Davidson-Loops vs 2-Kobland-Hullman
|
| 11 |
♠72
♥AJT432
♦A43
♣JT
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♥ 3♠ 4NT ♣4 ♦4 |
| EW: 3/2♦ ♣5 ♥0 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.63 1.38 4♥ S +1 ♦K 10-Davidson-Loops vs 2-Kobland-Hullman
450 2.63 1.38 4♥ N +1 ♣A 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
450 2.63 1.38 4♥ N +1 ♣5 1-Gamble-Spinazze vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
200 0.13 3.88 3♥ S +2 ♦K 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Hamlin-Black
|
| 12 |
♠Q853
♥Q72
♦Q74
♣AT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♣4/5 ♥6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.88 0.13 1N S +3 ♣9 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
130 1.38 2.63 3♦ S +1 ♦3 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Hamlin-Black
130 1.38 2.63 2♦ S +2 ♥5 1-Gamble-Spinazze vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
130 1.38 2.63 2♦ S +2 ♣7 10-Davidson-Loops vs 2-Kobland-Hullman
|
| 13 |
♠A5
♥AJT543
♦97
♣952
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.50 0.50 3N E -3 ♣K 1-Gamble-Spinazze vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
300 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -3 ♦9 2-Kobland-Hullman vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
200 2.00 2.00 2N E -2 ♣K 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Harken-Harken
150 0.50 3.50 2N E +1 ♥9 4-Hamlin-Black vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
150 0.50 3.50 2N E +1 ♥9 10-Davidson-Loops vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 14 |
♠JT9
♥62
♦KQT86
♣AKT
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/3♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥3 NT6 |
| EW: 4♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♠K 1-Gamble-Spinazze vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.00 1.00 5♥* E -1 ♣Q 2-Kobland-Hullman vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ E +1 ♦9 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Harken-Harken
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♣Q 10-Davidson-Loops vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♣7 4-Hamlin-Black vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 15 |
♠Q98
♥Q743
♦7642
♣QJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2/1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.50 0.50 3N E +2 ♥5 1-Gamble-Spinazze vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
460 3.50 0.50 3N E +2 ♥5 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Harken-Harken
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♥5 10-Davidson-Loops vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♣5 4-Hamlin-Black vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
480 1.00 3.00 2-Kobland-Hullman vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 17 |
♠95
♥QJT652
♦942
♣98
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 5♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ S ♣A 5-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 3.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♦A 10-Davidson-Loops vs 4-Hamlin-Black
50 2.00 2.00 2N W -1 ♠9 2-Kobland-Hullman vs 1-Gamble-Spinazze
150 0.50 3.50 3♦ S -3 ♣A 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 0.50 3.50 4♣ E +1 ♦A 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 18 |
♠KT5
♥A8764
♦Q94
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 2♦ W ♣5 5-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
120 3.00 1.00 2N E ♥K 10-Davidson-Loops vs 4-Hamlin-Black
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ W +2 ♣4 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
300 0.50 3.50 3♠ S -3 ♦K 2-Kobland-Hullman vs 1-Gamble-Spinazze
300 0.50 3.50 2♥ N -3 ♦2 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 19 |
♠A876
♥T87
♦5
♣QT985
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 5♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 2.00 3N E ♥6 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Kobland-Hullman
600 2.00 2.00 3N E ♥3 10-Davidson-Loops vs 5-Harken-Harken
600 2.00 2.00 5♦ W ♣Q 4-Hamlin-Black vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
600 2.00 2.00 5♦ W ♣T 1-Gamble-Spinazze vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
600 2.00 2.00 5♦ W ♣9 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 20 |
♠J9874
♥AKJ
♦7
♣KQJ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♦J 10-Davidson-Loops vs 5-Harken-Harken
100 2.50 1.50 2N W -1 ♥A 4-Hamlin-Black vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.50 1.50 3♣ E -1 ♠3 1-Gamble-Spinazze vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 1.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♣6 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Kobland-Hullman
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♠2 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 21 |
♠85
♥964
♦862
♣A7654
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1/-NT ♣7/6 ♥6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♠6 4-Hamlin-Black vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♥7 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Kobland-Hullman
50 2.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♥7 10-Davidson-Loops vs 5-Harken-Harken
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♦A 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 ♦A 1-Gamble-Spinazze vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 22 |
♠QJ643
♥AT54
♦Q92
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♦8 10-Davidson-Loops vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♦K 4-Hamlin-Black vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♦J 2-Kobland-Hullman vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 ♥7 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -2 ♦J 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Gamble-Spinazze
|
| 23 |
♠6
♥Q9754
♦K964
♣983
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 5♣ 6♠ 4/6NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 5♠ W ♣9 4-Hamlin-Black vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ E +1 ♥J 10-Davidson-Loops vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
680 1.00 3.00 5♠ E +1 ♥2 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♥5 2-Kobland-Hullman vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♦5 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Gamble-Spinazze
|
| 24 |
♠AQ8
♥9542
♦KT764
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N E ♦8 2-Kobland-Hullman vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
430 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠J 10-Davidson-Loops vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
430 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♥3 4-Hamlin-Black vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
430 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♣2 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Gamble-Spinazze
430 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♣2 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 25 |
♠984
♥QJ8632
♦J65
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣0 ♠0 NT0 |
| EW: 6♣ 6♠ 6NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.25 0.75 4♠ E +1 ♠6 5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Hamlin-Black
650 3.25 0.75 4♠ E +1 ♣2 10-Davidson-Loops vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
680 1.38 2.63 4♠ E +2 ♥A 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
710 0.13 3.88 4♠ E +3 ♣9 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 1-Gamble-Spinazze
|
| 26 |
♠KQ54
♥AT65
♦J732
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.88 0.13 4♥ N ♠J 5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Hamlin-Black
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♠J 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 1-Gamble-Spinazze
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ N +2 ♠J 10-Davidson-Loops vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 0.13 3.88 3N S -1 ♣5 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 27 |
♠JT3
♥Q43
♦AK73
♣QJ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.88 0.13 1N S ♠6 5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Hamlin-Black
50 2.63 1.38 1N E -1 ♣3 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 1-Gamble-Spinazze
110 0.75 3.25 1♠ W +1 ♦A 10-Davidson-Loops vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
110 0.75 3.25 2♥ W ♦K 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|