| 1 |
♠82
♥T543
♦AK72
♣AJ9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.75 0.25 4♦ N -1 ♠6 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Ray-Dau
140 2.50 2.50 3♠ E ♦Q 5-Gamble-Spinazze vs 2-Davidson-Winham
140 2.50 2.50 3♠ E ♦4 8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
150 0.25 4.75 5♦ N -3 ♥J 9-Harken-Harken vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 2 |
♠AKJ9
♥543
♦KJ76
♣A8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5/4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♥5 5-Gamble-Spinazze vs 2-Davidson-Winham
660 4.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♣J 9-Harken-Harken vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
630 1.75 3.25 3N N +1 ♣J 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Ray-Dau
620 0.25 4.75 4♠ N ♥A 8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
|
| 3 |
♠K64
♥Q7
♦AJ985
♣A42
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.25 1.75 3N N ♥A 5-Gamble-Spinazze vs 2-Davidson-Winham
400 3.25 1.75 3N N ♥3 9-Harken-Harken vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
400 3.25 1.75 3N N ♣6 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Ray-Dau
50 0.25 4.75 3N N -1 ♥A 8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
|
| 4 |
♠843
♥KQ97
♦JT
♣Q986
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 5♦ 5♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 4.75 0.25 3♠ E +3 ♣5 1-Ray-Dau vs 8-Loops-Walker
600 3.25 1.75 3N W ♥K 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Hamlin-Black
620 1.75 3.25 5♦ E +1 ♦5 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
680 0.25 4.75 4♠ E +2 ♣J 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Davidson-Winham
|
| 5 |
♠KJ654
♥8
♦T92
♣QT73
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ ♣4 ♦1 ♥0 NT1 |
| EW: 3♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.75 0.25 4♥ W -3 ♣5 1-Ray-Dau vs 8-Loops-Walker
100 3.25 1.75 4♥ W -2 ♣3 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Hamlin-Black
50 1.00 4.00 6♥ W -1 ♣3 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
50 1.00 4.00 4♥ W -1 ♠K 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Davidson-Winham
|
| 6 |
♠K9
♥A83
♦KJ65
♣Q982
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5/6 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.75 0.25 3♣ N -2 ♥Q 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Hamlin-Black
140 3.25 1.75 2♥ W +1 ♦5 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Davidson-Winham
170 1.75 3.25 3♠ W +1 ♣5 1-Ray-Dau vs 8-Loops-Walker
200 0.25 4.75 2♠ W +3 ♦5 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
|
| 7 |
♠KQJ6
♥J865
♦T985
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥6 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥T 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Hamlin-Black
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♥K 10-Keeley-Ducey vs 8-Loops-Walker
100 1.75 3.25 3♠ S -1 ♥T 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 5-Gamble-Spinazze
110 0.25 4.75 2♣ E +1 ♥A 2-Davidson-Winham vs 9-Harken-Harken
|
| 8 |
♠JT7
♥Q9854
♦AJT
♣A2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♠ ♦3/4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 1.75 3♦ S -1 ♠Q 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Hamlin-Black
50 3.25 1.75 3♦ S -1 ♣Q 2-Davidson-Winham vs 9-Harken-Harken
50 3.25 1.75 2♦ S -1 ♣Q 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 5-Gamble-Spinazze
100 0.25 4.75 3N N -2 ♠4 10-Keeley-Ducey vs 8-Loops-Walker
|
| 9 |
♠AK98653
♥6
♦743
♣Q3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/2♣ 4♠ 6/-NT ♦6/5 ♥4 NT12/4 |
| EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.75 0.25 5♥ E -2 ♣A 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 5-Gamble-Spinazze
100 3.25 1.75 4♥ E -1 ♣A 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Hamlin-Black
230 1.75 3.25 2♥ E +4 ♠Q 10-Keeley-Ducey vs 8-Loops-Walker
680 0.25 4.75 4♥ E +2 ♠Q 2-Davidson-Winham vs 9-Harken-Harken
|
| 10 |
♠KT4
♥T
♦T43
♣KJ8753
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1/-♥ 1♠ 2NT ♥7/6 |
| EW: ♣3/4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.75 0.25 2N E -3 ♣T 2-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
150 3.25 1.75 2N N +1 ♠8 10-Keeley-Ducey vs 9-Harken-Harken
100 1.00 4.00 1N E -1 ♥Q 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 1.00 4.00 2♠ W -1 ♥T 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
|
| 11 |
♠A982
♥6542
♦T75
♣A7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5/4 NT5/4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 4.75 0.25 Pass Out 2-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
90 3.25 1.75 1N W ♥2 10-Keeley-Ducey vs 9-Harken-Harken
120 1.75 3.25 1N W +1 ♥4 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
180 0.25 4.75 1N E +3 ♦T 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
|
| 12 |
♠A842
♥KQ96
♦AJ
♣Q87
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 1.00 4♥ N ♦7 10-Keeley-Ducey vs 9-Harken-Harken
620 4.00 1.00 4♥ N ♦7 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♠3 2-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♠3 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
|
| 13 |
♠KT2
♥K64
♦AQ83
♣T87
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.90 0.10 4♠ S ♣A 3-Hamlin-Black vs 8-Loops-Walker
170 3.70 1.30 2♠ S +2 ♣A 1-Ray-Dau vs 10-Keeley-Ducey
130 1.90 3.10 3♦ N +1 ♣Q 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 11-Hullman-Kobland
130 1.90 3.10 3♦ N +1 ♣Q 9-Harken-Harken vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
90 0.10 4.90 1N N ♣5 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Gamble-Spinazze
|
| 14 |
♠7
♥QT
♦T732
♣AQ8743
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
| EW: 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.90 0.10 3♣ N -1 ♦4 1-Ray-Dau vs 10-Keeley-Ducey
200 3.10 1.90 3♥ E +2 ♦6 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 11-Hullman-Kobland
200 3.10 1.90 2♥ E +3 ♣5 9-Harken-Harken vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
420 1.30 3.70 4♥ E ♣A 3-Hamlin-Black vs 8-Loops-Walker
450 0.10 4.90 4♥ E +1 ♣9 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Gamble-Spinazze
|
| 15 |
♠AK87
♥854
♦743
♣J76
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 3♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.90 0.10 4♠ W -1 ♣J 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Gamble-Spinazze
110 1.90 3.10 2♠ W ♣J 3-Hamlin-Black vs 8-Loops-Walker
110 1.90 3.10 3♦ W ♠A 9-Harken-Harken vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
110 1.90 3.10 2♦ W +1 ♠A 1-Ray-Dau vs 10-Keeley-Ducey
110 1.90 3.10 2♦ W +1 ♠K 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 11-Hullman-Kobland
|
| 16 |
♠9
♥A93
♦64
♣AKQ9765
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 |
| EW: 1♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 5.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥5 4-Gelfand-MacGregor vs 9-Harken-Harken
400 4.00 1.00 3N S ♠5 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
200 2.50 2.50 4♠ E -2 ♣T 2-Davidson-Winham vs 10-Keeley-Ducey
200 2.50 2.50 4♠ E -2 ♣5 5-Gamble-Spinazze vs 3-Hamlin-Black
150 1.00 4.00 3♣ N +2 ♠K 8-Loops-Walker vs 11-Hullman-Kobland
50 0.00 5.00 5♣ N -1 ♠K 1-Ray-Dau vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 17 |
♠J743
♥A54
♦A432
♣T9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2/1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 1N W -2 ♣T 1-Ray-Dau vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
50 4.00 1.00 1N S -1 ♣A 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
90 2.50 2.50 1N W ♠3 2-Davidson-Winham vs 10-Keeley-Ducey
90 2.50 2.50 1N W ♠3 8-Loops-Walker vs 11-Hullman-Kobland
120 0.50 4.50 1N W +1 ♠5 4-Gelfand-MacGregor vs 9-Harken-Harken
120 0.50 4.50 1N W +1 ♠5 5-Gamble-Spinazze vs 3-Hamlin-Black
|
| 18 |
♠J952
♥A98
♦7
♣QT853
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 5.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠6 5-Gamble-Spinazze vs 3-Hamlin-Black
150 4.00 1.00 2N E -3 ♣K 2-Davidson-Winham vs 10-Keeley-Ducey
50 1.50 3.50 1N E -1 ♥3 4-Gelfand-MacGregor vs 9-Harken-Harken
50 1.50 3.50 3♦ E -1 ♦3 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 1.50 3.50 2♦ E -1 ♥3 8-Loops-Walker vs 11-Hullman-Kobland
50 1.50 3.50 2♦ E -1 ♥2 1-Ray-Dau vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 19 |
♠K976
♥4
♦KJ9642
♣43
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣2 ♥2 |
| EW: 3♣ 5♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 3♣ W ♥4 2-Davidson-Winham vs 8-Loops-Walker
200 3.50 1.50 3♥ E +2 ♠5 10-Keeley-Ducey vs 3-Hamlin-Black
200 3.50 1.50 2♥ E +3 ♦A 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 9-Harken-Harken
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♠8 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦A 5-Gamble-Spinazze vs 1-Ray-Dau
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦A 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 20 |
♠6432
♥-
♦QJT5
♣KJT64
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣5/4 ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 5.00 0.00 4♥* E -4 ♣5 5-Gamble-Spinazze vs 1-Ray-Dau
300 4.00 1.00 4♥ E -3 ♣A 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
100 2.50 2.50 2♠ S -1 ♥9 10-Keeley-Ducey vs 3-Hamlin-Black
100 2.50 2.50 2♥ S -1 ♣3 2-Davidson-Winham vs 8-Loops-Walker
110 1.00 4.00 2♥ E ♣A 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 9-Harken-Harken
200 0.00 5.00 3♠ S -2 ♥9 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 21 |
♠Q94
♥JT8
♦KQT62
♣T3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 3♥ 1/-NT ♣6/5 ♠6/5 NT7/6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.50 0.50 2N S +2 ♣8 5-Gamble-Spinazze vs 1-Ray-Dau
180 4.50 0.50 2N S +2 ♣8 10-Keeley-Ducey vs 3-Hamlin-Black
170 3.00 2.00 2♥ S +2 ♣9 12-Traback-Tidmore vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
140 1.50 3.50 3♥ S ♦8 2-Davidson-Winham vs 8-Loops-Walker
140 1.50 3.50 2♥ S +1 ♦8 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 9-Harken-Harken
200 0.00 5.00 2N S -2 ♠5 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
|
| 22 |
♠AT6
♥A8742
♦6
♣K652
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣4/3 ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.30 0.70 3♥ N ♣A 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Davidson-Winham
140 4.30 0.70 2♥ N +1 ♠Q 3-Hamlin-Black vs 9-Harken-Harken
100 2.50 2.50 1N E -1 ♦5 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 1-Ray-Dau
120 1.30 3.70 1N E +1 ♦7 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Gamble-Spinazze
140 0.10 4.90 2♠ E +1 ♥3 10-Keeley-Ducey vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
|
| 23 |
♠Q9873
♥642
♦A42
♣KQ
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥5/4 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.90 0.10 4♣ W -3 ♠Q 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Gamble-Spinazze
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ N ♦8 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Davidson-Winham
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ N ♦8 10-Keeley-Ducey vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ N ♦8 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 1-Ray-Dau
200 0.10 4.90 3♠ N -2 ♦8 3-Hamlin-Black vs 9-Harken-Harken
|
| 24 |
♠932
♥QJ54
♦K42
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.90 0.10 2♠ W -1 ♥Q 3-Hamlin-Black vs 9-Harken-Harken
100 3.10 1.90 3♥ S -2 ♥8 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Gamble-Spinazze
100 3.10 1.90 3♥ S -2 ♣J 11-Hullman-Kobland vs 1-Ray-Dau
140 1.30 3.70 3♠ E ♦2 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Davidson-Winham
170 0.10 4.90 2♠ W +2 ♥4 10-Keeley-Ducey vs 4-Gelfand-MacGregor
|
| 25 |
♠KT74
♥Q9
♦K842
♣T64
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5/4 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.75 0.25 2♠ W ♦8 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Hamlin-Black
140 3.25 1.75 2♠ W +1 ♥Q 5-Gamble-Spinazze vs 10-Keeley-Ducey
600 1.75 3.25 3N E ♥Q 4-Gelfand-MacGregor vs 1-Ray-Dau
630 0.25 4.75 3N E +1 ♥6 8-Loops-Walker vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 26 |
♠A7
♥K52
♦76
♣KQT976
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥3/2 ♠4 |
| EW: 4♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠3 8-Loops-Walker vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 4.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♦5 5-Gamble-Spinazze vs 10-Keeley-Ducey
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ E ♦8 4-Gelfand-MacGregor vs 1-Ray-Dau
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ E ♦8 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Hamlin-Black
|
| 27 |
♠AK92
♥Q8
♦JT
♣KQT93
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♣2 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Hamlin-Black
50 4.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♦3 5-Gamble-Spinazze vs 10-Keeley-Ducey
100 1.75 3.25 1N N -2 ♠2 8-Loops-Walker vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
140 0.25 4.75 3♥ W ♣K 4-Gelfand-MacGregor vs 1-Ray-Dau
|