| 1 |
♠AT8
♥A952
♦AT5
♣984
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 0.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♣3 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 1-Kobland-Pender
100 0.50 0.50 2♦ E -2 ♣A 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 2 |
♠8543
♥QJ4
♦Q94
♣A95
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.00 0.00 2♥ W ♦4 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 1-Kobland-Pender
200 0.00 1.00 3♦ S -2 ♥A 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 3 |
♠5
♥Q95
♦T86
♣QJ9632
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♦ 5/4NT ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 1.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♦3 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 1-Kobland-Pender
400 0.00 1.00 3N S ♦5 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 4 |
♠3
♥JT8753
♦T4
♣AQT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥J 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 1-Kobland-Pender
630 0.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♥2 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 5 |
♠652
♥3
♦T8
♣AKQT986
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
| EW: 5♦ 5♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 0.50 0.50 5♥ W ♣A 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 1-Kobland-Pender
450 0.50 0.50 4♥ W +1 ♣A 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 6 |
♠53
♥AQJT83
♦T3
♣KJ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦0 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 5/6♦ 4/5♠ 5NT ♣4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 1.00 0.00 5♦ E ♥5 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Loops-Walker
650 0.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♠5 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|
| 7 |
♠643
♥J87
♦J972
♣Q65
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠4 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 1.00 0.00 3♠ E -3 ♦A 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Loops-Walker
90 0.00 1.00 2♣ W ♦2 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|
| 8 |
♠A8
♥KJ3
♦KQJ9
♣AQT6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 5♠ 4/5NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣2/3 ♦3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 1.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♥9 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Loops-Walker
420 0.00 1.00 4♠ N ♦7 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|
| 9 |
♠A96532
♥52
♦A3
♣K95
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2/3♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 1.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♠T 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Loops-Walker
50 0.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♥A 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|
| 10 |
♠A5
♥QJ9532
♦74
♣KJ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1/-♠ ♥5 ♠7/6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♠Q 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Loops-Walker
100 0.00 1.00 2N W -1 ♥Q 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|
| 11 |
♠Q
♥A97653
♦43
♣8754
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 0.00 2♦ W -2 ♠Q 4-Loops-Walker vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
150 0.00 1.00 4♥ N -3 ♦8 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
|
| 12 |
♠AK6
♥K75
♦8632
♣852
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.00 0.00 1N E +1 ♥8 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
140 0.00 1.00 3♠ E ♥5 4-Loops-Walker vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 13 |
♠82
♥Q973
♦KT83
♣952
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 1.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♣6 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
90 0.00 1.00 1N W ♣2 4-Loops-Walker vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 14 |
♠K6
♥K97543
♦76
♣T73
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 5♠ 4NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.00 0.00 4♠ W ♦7 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
450 0.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♦7 4-Loops-Walker vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 15 |
♠KT4
♥AQT2
♦54
♣AKQ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 4♥ ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣4/5 ♦6 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 1.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 ♣A 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
110 0.00 1.00 2♠ W ♣A 4-Loops-Walker vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 16 |
♠83
♥Q862
♦KQJ93
♣A5
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 2♥ 6♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.00 0.00 5♦ N -3 ♠6 1-Kobland-Pender vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
680 0.00 1.00 4♠ W +2 ♦K 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 4-Loops-Walker
|
| 17 |
♠QJT4
♥AQJT42
♦-
♣AK4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♥ 7♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥0 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 1.00 0.00 4♥ N +3 ♦A 1-Kobland-Pender vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
480 0.00 1.00 4♥ N +2 ♦A 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 4-Loops-Walker
|
| 18 |
♠5
♥JT76
♦Q62
♣KQ954
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 6♥ 1♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥1 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.00 0.00 5♥ S ♠4 1-Kobland-Pender vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
500 0.00 1.00 4♠* W -3 ♥J 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 4-Loops-Walker
|
| 19 |
♠A5
♥A6432
♦KT7
♣Q85
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 4♥ ♣2 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 ♦6 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 4-Loops-Walker
620 0.00 1.00 4♠ E ♥Q 1-Kobland-Pender vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
|
| 20 |
♠53
♥KT865
♦K96
♣J96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4/5 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2/1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2/1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♥J 1-Kobland-Pender vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
110 0.00 1.00 2♠ W ♥6 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 4-Loops-Walker
|
| 21 |
♠QJT875
♥5
♦AQ97
♣Q4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♦ 5♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦2 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.00 0.00 4♠ N ♥A 4-Loops-Walker vs 1-Kobland-Pender
50 0.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠A 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 22 |
♠AKT42
♥A63
♦54
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ 1/2NT ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 0.50 0.50 3♠ N ♦7 4-Loops-Walker vs 1-Kobland-Pender
140 0.50 0.50 3♠ N ♦3 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 23 |
♠KJ873
♥2
♦AK5
♣J973
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/2♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.00 0.00 2♥ E +2 ♠9 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
600 0.00 1.00 3N W ♠7 4-Loops-Walker vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|
| 24 |
♠T
♥Q9765
♦AK762
♣AK
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/2♣ 3♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠6/5 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.00 0.00 5♥ N ♠8 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
100 0.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♥A 4-Loops-Walker vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|
| 25 |
♠K6
♥T764
♦QJT76
♣Q7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♣T 6-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
140 0.00 1.00 3♠ E ♥8 4-Loops-Walker vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|