| 1 |
♠A86
♥AT942
♦-
♣QT642
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 6♥ 5NT ♦4 ♠6 |
| EW: 3♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 7.94 0.06 5♥ N ♦A 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
420 6.25 1.75 4♥ N ♠Q 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
420 6.25 1.75 4♥ N ♠Q 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
300 4.56 3.44 5♦* W -2 ♣A 4-Loops-Loops vs 7-Hullman-Pender
170 3.44 4.56 3♥ N +1 ♠Q 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 1-Hill-Xu
140 2.31 5.69 3♥ N ♣J 10-Walker-Gamble vs 10-Cowen-Downing
100 1.19 6.81 5♦ E -2 ♣A 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 5-Moller-Andrews
50 0.06 7.94 4♦ W -1 ♥6 8-Harken-Winham vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
| 2 |
♠T85
♥J953
♦Q965
♣A5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2/1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠5/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 7.94 0.06 1♠ S +2 ♦2 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 5-Moller-Andrews
120 6.81 1.19 1N S +1 ♦2 10-Walker-Gamble vs 10-Cowen-Downing
80 5.69 2.31 1♠ S ♦2 4-Loops-Loops vs 7-Hullman-Pender
50 4.56 3.44 1N W -1 ♠T 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
90 3.44 4.56 1N E ♥2 8-Harken-Winham vs 6-Martin-Dau
100 2.31 5.69 2♥ N -1 ♦8 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 1-Hill-Xu
200 0.63 7.38 1N N -2 ♣T 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
200 0.63 7.38 1N N -2 ♣6 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
|
| 3 |
♠QJ5
♥743
♦AJ3
♣A932
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 7.38 0.63 4♥ W -1 ♠Q 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
100 7.38 0.63 3♥ W -1 ♥3 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
PASS 5.69 2.31 Pass Out 8-Harken-Winham vs 6-Martin-Dau
110 4.56 3.44 2♥ W ♠Q 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
140 2.31 5.69 3♥ W ♠Q 10-Walker-Gamble vs 10-Cowen-Downing
140 2.31 5.69 2♥ W +1 ♠Q 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 1-Hill-Xu
140 2.31 5.69 2♥ W +1 ♦3 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 5-Moller-Andrews
170 0.06 7.94 2♥ W +2 ♠Q 4-Loops-Loops vs 7-Hullman-Pender
|
| 4 |
♠KQJ
♥AJ54
♦86
♣AT76
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 7.94 0.06 3♦* E -3 ♠T 10-Walker-Gamble vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
300 6.81 1.19 3♠ W -3 ♠K 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Hullman-Pender
140 5.69 2.31 3♥ N ♦K 8-Harken-Winham vs 5-Moller-Andrews
100 4.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♦K 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 10-Cowen-Downing
100 4.00 4.00 3♥ N -1 ♦K 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
200 1.19 6.81 4♥ S -2 ♦K 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
200 1.19 6.81 4♥ N -2 ♦K 4-Loops-Loops vs 6-Martin-Dau
200 1.19 6.81 3♥ N -2 ♦K 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 1-Hill-Xu
|
| 5 |
♠T7
♥AK753
♦8
♣K9852
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 7.38 0.63 4♦ W -3 ♥A 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 1-Hill-Xu
150 7.38 0.63 4♦ W -3 ♥A 8-Harken-Winham vs 5-Moller-Andrews
140 5.69 2.31 3♥ N ♦6 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Hullman-Pender
100 4.56 3.44 2♥ N -1 ♠4 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 10-Cowen-Downing
110 3.44 4.56 3♦ E ♥9 4-Loops-Loops vs 6-Martin-Dau
200 1.75 6.25 4♠ S -2 ♦A 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
200 1.75 6.25 4♥ N -2 ♠4 10-Walker-Gamble vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
300 0.06 7.94 4♥ N -3 ♠4 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
|
| 6 |
♠KQ2
♥AK4
♦A86
♣K943
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.13 2.88 3N S ♥9 10-Walker-Gamble vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
400 5.13 2.88 3N N ♠9 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
400 5.13 2.88 3N N ♠5 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
400 5.13 2.88 3N N ♠3 4-Loops-Loops vs 6-Martin-Dau
400 5.13 2.88 3N N ♠3 8-Harken-Winham vs 5-Moller-Andrews
400 5.13 2.88 3N N ♥2 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Hullman-Pender
50 0.63 7.38 3N S -1 ♥9 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 10-Cowen-Downing
50 0.63 7.38 3N S -1 ♥5 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 1-Hill-Xu
|
| 7 |
♠K84
♥64
♦J62
♣AKQ52
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 7.94 0.06 3♥ E -2 ♣9 8-Harken-Winham vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
120 6.25 1.75 1N S +1 ♥2 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
120 6.25 1.75 1N S +1 ♥2 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 6-Martin-Dau
110 4.00 4.00 2♣ N +1 ♥A 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
110 4.00 4.00 2♣ N +1 ♥A 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 10-Cowen-Downing
110 1.19 6.81 2♥ E ♣4 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 1-Hill-Xu
110 1.19 6.81 2♥ E ♣4 10-Walker-Gamble vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
110 1.19 6.81 1♥ E +1 ♣4 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 7-Hullman-Pender
|
| 8 |
♠JT854
♥J
♦94
♣A7532
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3/2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2/1♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 7.94 0.06 3♣ S +2 ♥A 10-Walker-Gamble vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
130 6.81 1.19 3♣ S +1 ♠3 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 1-Hill-Xu
100 5.69 2.31 3♥ W -2 ♦9 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 10-Cowen-Downing
50 3.44 4.56 3♥ W -1 ♠J 8-Harken-Winham vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
50 3.44 4.56 3♥ W -1 ♠J 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 6-Martin-Dau
50 3.44 4.56 2♥ W -1 ♦4 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
110 0.63 7.38 2♥ W ♠J 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 7-Hullman-Pender
110 0.63 7.38 2♥ W ♠5 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
|
| 9 |
♠K73
♥AT853
♦75
♣A32
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 7.94 0.06 2♥ N +3 ♣K 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 10-Cowen-Downing
140 6.25 1.75 2♥ N +1 ♦K 10-Walker-Gamble vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
140 6.25 1.75 2♥ N +1 ♣K 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 1-Hill-Xu
110 4.56 3.44 2♥ N ♠4 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
PASS 2.31 5.69 Pass Out 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
PASS 2.31 5.69 Pass Out 8-Harken-Winham vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
PASS 2.31 5.69 Pass Out 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 6-Martin-Dau
110 0.06 7.94 2♠ W ♦7 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 7-Hullman-Pender
|
| 10 |
♠T8
♥7
♦KT93
♣AQJ843
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 5♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1370 7.94 0.06 6♣ S ♥K 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 10-Cowen-Downing
620 6.25 1.75 5♣ N +1 ♥A 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 5-Moller-Andrews
620 6.25 1.75 5♣ N +1 ♣T 10-Walker-Gamble vs 7-Hullman-Pender
170 4.56 3.44 4♣ S +2 ♥K 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
100 1.75 6.25 3N S -1 ♥K 4-Loops-Loops vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
100 1.75 6.25 3N S -1 ♥5 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
100 1.75 6.25 3N S -1 ♥5 8-Harken-Winham vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.75 6.25 3N S -1 ♥2 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
|
| 11 |
♠AQ53
♥8542
♦K42
♣J7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 7.94 0.06 4♥ S ♣5 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
140 4.56 3.44 3♥ S ♣A 10-Walker-Gamble vs 7-Hullman-Pender
140 4.56 3.44 3♥ S ♣5 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 5-Moller-Andrews
140 4.56 3.44 3♥ S ♣2 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
140 4.56 3.44 3♥ S ♣2 8-Harken-Winham vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
140 4.56 3.44 2♥ S +1 ♣2 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
50 0.63 7.38 4♥ S -1 ♣5 4-Loops-Loops vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
50 0.63 7.38 4♥ N -1 ♣3 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 10-Cowen-Downing
|
| 12 |
♠-
♥T975432
♦KJ94
♣98
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦2 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 7.38 0.63 4♠* W -2 ♥T 8-Harken-Winham vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
300 7.38 0.63 4♠* W -2 ♦4 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 5-Moller-Andrews
100 5.13 2.88 3♠* W -1 ♥T 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 10-Cowen-Downing
100 5.13 2.88 3♠* W -1 ♥T 10-Walker-Gamble vs 7-Hullman-Pender
50 3.44 4.56 3♠ W -1 ♦4 4-Loops-Loops vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
110 1.75 6.25 1♠ W +1 ♥T 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
110 1.75 6.25 1♠ W +1 ♥5 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
200 0.06 7.94 4♥* S -1 ♠A 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 13 |
♠T743
♥432
♦J82
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 8.00 0.00 2♦ E -2 ♥A 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 1-Hill-Xu
150 7.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♠2 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
120 4.50 3.50 1N S +1 ♠4 8-Harken-Winham vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
120 4.50 3.50 1N S +1 ♠2 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
120 4.50 3.50 1N S +1 ♠2 4-Loops-Loops vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
120 4.50 3.50 1N S +1 ♠2 10-Walker-Gamble vs 6-Martin-Dau
90 1.00 7.00 1N S ♠2 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 7-Hullman-Pender
90 1.00 7.00 1N S ♠2 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 5-Moller-Andrews
90 1.00 7.00 1N S ♠2 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
|
| 14 |
♠K65
♥97
♦K965
♣T742
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 8.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣2 8-Harken-Winham vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
120 7.00 1.00 2N E ♥3 4-Loops-Loops vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
170 6.00 2.00 3♥ E +1 ♠3 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
180 5.00 3.00 1N W +3 ♣2 10-Walker-Gamble vs 6-Martin-Dau
400 3.00 5.00 3N W ♣2 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 1-Hill-Xu
400 3.00 5.00 3N E ♥3 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 7-Hullman-Pender
400 3.00 5.00 3N E ♥3 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
430 1.00 7.00 3N W +1 ♠5 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 5-Moller-Andrews
460 0.00 8.00 3N W +2 ♥9 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
|
| 15 |
♠3
♥T82
♦KJ86
♣KT976
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥1/0 ♠1/0 NT2/0 |
| EW: 6♥ 6♠ 5NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 8.00 0.00 3♥ W +2 ♦7 10-Walker-Gamble vs 6-Martin-Dau
230 7.00 1.00 3♥ W +3 ♦K 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 1-Hill-Xu
260 5.50 2.50 3♥ W +4 ♠3 4-Loops-Loops vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
260 5.50 2.50 3♥ W +4 ♠3 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
450 4.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♣6 8-Harken-Winham vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
480 3.00 5.00 4♠ E +2 ♣3 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
510 1.50 6.50 4♥ W +3 ♠3 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
510 1.50 6.50 4♥ W +3 ♠3 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 5-Moller-Andrews
980 0.00 8.00 6♠ W ♣7 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 7-Hullman-Pender
|
| 16 |
♠Q87654
♥A3
♦JT
♣T97
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ -/1♦ 3♠ 1/-NT ♦6/7 ♥6/5 NT7/6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 7.94 0.06 2♠ N +1 ♣J 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
110 5.69 2.31 2♠ N ♥7 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
110 5.69 2.31 2♠ N ♣J 10-Walker-Gamble vs 5-Moller-Andrews
110 5.69 2.31 2♠ N ♣3 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
100 2.88 5.13 2♥ E -1 ♠9 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 6-Martin-Dau
100 2.88 5.13 2♥ E -1 ♦A 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 10-Cowen-Downing
50 1.19 6.81 3♠ N -1 ♥6 8-Harken-Winham vs 1-Hill-Xu
150 0.06 7.94 3N S -3 ♥4 4-Loops-Loops vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 17 |
♠T9865
♥T987
♦-
♣T543
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥6 ♠6 NT1 |
| EW: 1♣ 6♦ 1♥ 6NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 7.94 0.06 5♦ E +1 ♣Q 4-Loops-Loops vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
460 6.81 1.19 3N E +2 ♣8 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 10-Cowen-Downing
520 5.13 2.88 3N W +4 ♠T 8-Harken-Winham vs 1-Hill-Xu
520 5.13 2.88 3N E +4 ♠3 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
920 1.75 6.25 6♦ E ♠3 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
920 1.75 6.25 6♦ E ♦7 10-Walker-Gamble vs 5-Moller-Andrews
920 1.75 6.25 6♦ E ♣Q 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 6-Martin-Dau
920 1.75 6.25 6♦ E ♣Q 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
|
| 18 |
♠QJ96
♥QJT92
♦Q6
♣K5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/2♦ 3/4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 7.38 0.63 4♠ S +2 ♥8 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 10-Cowen-Downing
680 7.38 0.63 4♠ S +2 ♥8 10-Walker-Gamble vs 5-Moller-Andrews
650 5.13 2.88 4♠ S +1 ♥8 4-Loops-Loops vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
650 5.13 2.88 4♠ S +1 ♣9 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
620 2.31 5.69 4♠ S ♠3 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 6-Martin-Dau
620 2.31 5.69 4♠ S ♣3 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
620 2.31 5.69 4♠ S ♣3 8-Harken-Winham vs 1-Hill-Xu
100 0.06 7.94 5♠ S -1 ♣5 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
|
| 19 |
♠T9653
♥T85
♦KQ
♣JT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
| EW: 6♣ 1♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 8.00 0.00 5♣ E ♦T 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 6-Martin-Dau
630 6.50 1.50 3N W +1 ♦K 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
630 6.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♦5 4-Loops-Loops vs 1-Hill-Xu
660 4.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♠5 10-Walker-Gamble vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
660 4.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♦T 8-Harken-Winham vs 10-Cowen-Downing
690 1.50 6.50 3N W +3 ♠T 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 7-Hullman-Pender
690 1.50 6.50 3N W +3 ♠5 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 5-Moller-Andrews
690 1.50 6.50 3N W +3 ♠5 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
690 1.50 6.50 3N E +3 ♥2 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
|
| 20 |
♠AKT72
♥JT53
♦T
♣KT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♣ 6♦ 1/2♥ 7♠ 3/4NT |
| EW: ♣0 ♦1 ♥5 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 7.50 0.50 6♠ N +1 ♥K 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
1460 7.50 0.50 6♠ N +1 ♣9 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 7-Hullman-Pender
710 4.00 4.00 4♠ N +3 ♥K 8-Harken-Winham vs 10-Cowen-Downing
710 4.00 4.00 4♠ N +3 ♥K 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
710 4.00 4.00 4♠ N +3 ♣9 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
710 4.00 4.00 4♠ N +3 ♣5 4-Loops-Loops vs 1-Hill-Xu
710 4.00 4.00 4♠ N +3 ♣3 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 6-Martin-Dau
680 1.00 7.00 4♠ N +2 ♦2 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 5-Moller-Andrews
200 0.00 8.00 6N S -2 ♥A 10-Walker-Gamble vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
|
| 21 |
♠AQ82
♥Q4
♦652
♣AT75
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 7.50 0.50 4♦ S ♣8 8-Harken-Winham vs 10-Cowen-Downing
130 7.50 0.50 2♦ S +2 ♣K 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
50 6.00 2.00 5♣ W -1 ♦6 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
130 5.00 3.00 4♣ W ♦2 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
140 4.00 4.00 3♥ W ♦2 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 5-Moller-Andrews
490 3.00 5.00 3N W +3 ♣5 4-Loops-Loops vs 1-Hill-Xu
510 1.50 6.50 4♣* W ♥Q 10-Walker-Gamble vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
510 1.50 6.50 4♣* W ♦5 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 6-Martin-Dau
630 0.00 8.00 3♥* W +1 ♦6 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 7-Hullman-Pender
|
| 22 |
♠J65
♥Q753
♦A43
♣AT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 7.94 0.06 3N W -3 ♥3 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 5-Moller-Andrews
200 6.81 1.19 1N E -2 ♠4 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
100 5.69 2.31 2N E -1 ♠4 10-Walker-Gamble vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
50 4.56 3.44 2♠ N -1 ♥A 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 6-Martin-Dau
90 3.44 4.56 1N E ♠2 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
120 1.19 6.81 2N W ♥3 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Hill-Xu
120 1.19 6.81 2N E ♠4 4-Loops-Loops vs 10-Cowen-Downing
120 1.19 6.81 1N E +1 ♠4 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
|
| 23 |
♠KQ5
♥KT743
♦7642
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♥ 4♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 7.94 0.06 4♠ S ♦A 10-Walker-Gamble vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
170 3.44 4.56 3♠ S +1 ♥5 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
170 3.44 4.56 3♠ S +1 ♦A 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 5-Moller-Andrews
170 3.44 4.56 3♠ S +1 ♦A 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Hill-Xu
170 3.44 4.56 2♠ S +2 ♦A 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
170 3.44 4.56 2♠ S +2 ♦A 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
170 3.44 4.56 2♠ S +2 ♦A 4-Loops-Loops vs 10-Cowen-Downing
170 3.44 4.56 1♠ S +3 ♦A 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
| 24 |
♠K976
♥A72
♦AJ94
♣AQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠6 |
| EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 7.94 0.06 4♥ S +1 ♦7 10-Walker-Gamble vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
430 6.81 1.19 3N N +1 ♣T 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
420 5.13 2.88 4♥ S ♠A 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 6-Martin-Dau
420 5.13 2.88 4♥ S ♠A 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 5-Moller-Andrews
400 2.31 5.69 3N N ♠Q 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
400 2.31 5.69 3N N ♠Q 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Hill-Xu
400 2.31 5.69 3N N ♠5 4-Loops-Loops vs 10-Cowen-Downing
120 0.06 7.94 2N N ♠4 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
|
| 25 |
♠A3
♥QJ762
♦AK93
♣J4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦2/1 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 7.94 0.06 3N N +1 ♥T 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 1-Hill-Xu
400 6.81 1.19 3N N ♥J 10-Walker-Gamble vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
170 5.69 2.31 2♥ N +2 ♠6 4-Loops-Loops vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
140 4.56 3.44 3♥ N ♠J 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 7-Hullman-Pender
50 2.31 5.69 3N N -1 ♠5 8-Harken-Winham vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
50 2.31 5.69 3♥ N -1 ♠6 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
50 2.31 5.69 2♥ N -1 ♠6 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 5-Moller-Andrews
150 0.06 7.94 3N S -3 ♠K 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 26 |
♠KQT3
♥J876
♦K74
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 7.38 0.63 2N E -1 ♣J 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
100 7.38 0.63 2♦ E -1 ♣J 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 5-Moller-Andrews
80 5.69 2.31 1♥ W ♠K 10-Walker-Gamble vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
120 4.00 4.00 2N E ♣7 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 7-Hullman-Pender
120 4.00 4.00 2N E ♣3 8-Harken-Winham vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
130 2.31 5.69 1♦ E +3 ♣J 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 1-Hill-Xu
150 1.19 6.81 1N E +2 ♣3 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
300 0.06 7.94 2♣ S -3 ♦2 4-Loops-Loops vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
|
| 27 |
♠KJ
♥QT932
♦AKQ
♣A53
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 7.94 0.06 2N N ♣K 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
100 6.81 1.19 4♠* W -1 ♦A 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 5-Moller-Andrews
50 4.56 3.44 1N N -1 ♣6 4-Loops-Loops vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
50 4.56 3.44 4♥ N -1 ♠T 10-Walker-Gamble vs 2-Kobland-Davidson
50 4.56 3.44 4♥ N -1 ♣K 8-Harken-Winham vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
100 2.31 5.69 3N N -2 ♠4 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 1-Hill-Xu
110 1.19 6.81 3♣ E ♥6 1-Keeley-Ducey vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
140 0.06 7.94 2♠ W +1 ♦A 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 7-Hullman-Pender
|
| 28 |
♠72
♥-
♦Q762
♣KQ98632
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦3/4 NT3/4 |
| EW: 1/3♦ 1/3NT ♣3 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 7.86 0.14 5♦* E -4 ♥A 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
150 6.57 1.43 4♦ E -3 ♥A 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
100 5.29 2.71 4♦ E -2 ♣T 4-Loops-Loops vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
50 4.00 4.00 4♦ E -1 ♥A 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
100 2.07 5.93 4♠ N -1 ♦A 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 10-Cowen-Downing
100 2.07 5.93 4♥ S -1 ♠A 8-Harken-Winham vs 7-Hullman-Pender
400 0.14 7.86 5♣ N -4 ♠Q 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
| 29 |
♠AQ8765
♥Q7
♦2
♣K984
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦2 ♠0 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 7.86 0.14 6♠ N +1 ♠J 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
650 3.36 4.64 5♠ N ♥6 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 10-Cowen-Downing
650 3.36 4.64 5♠ N ♥3 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
650 3.36 4.64 4♠ N +1 ♥6 4-Loops-Loops vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
650 3.36 4.64 4♠ N +1 ♥6 8-Harken-Winham vs 7-Hullman-Pender
650 3.36 4.64 4♠ N +1 ♥4 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
650 3.36 4.64 4♠ N +1 ♥2 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
| 30 |
♠A83
♥63
♦K965432
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6/5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 7.86 0.14 3♠ E -5 ♦T 9-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 9-Spinazze-Ray
50 6.57 1.43 2♥ E -1 ♦T 5-Sedey-Formoso vs 10-Cowen-Downing
50 4.00 4.00 3♦ N -1 ♠5 2-Slinger-Llacera vs 4-Graves-Shoemaker
50 4.00 4.00 3♦ N -1 ♠5 3-Frank-Emanuel vs 6-Martin-Dau
50 4.00 4.00 3♦ N -1 ♣9 6-Friedberg-Slinger vs 3-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.43 6.57 3♦ N -2 ♠5 4-Loops-Loops vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
150 0.14 7.86 2N S -3 ♦7 8-Harken-Winham vs 7-Hullman-Pender
|