| 1 |
♠JT86
♥94
♦AKJ
♣AKJ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 3♦ 6♥ 4♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 2.00 0.00 6♥ S ♣7 2-Winham-Davidson vs 4-Hullman-Girouard
430 0.50 1.50 3N S +1 ♦2 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
430 0.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♠4 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Walker-Loops
|
| 2 |
♠3
♥765
♦KT963
♣KT42
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ ♣6 ♦6/7 ♥4 ♠3 NT5/4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ W +1 ♠3 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Walker-Loops
140 1.50 0.50 1♥ W +2 ♠3 2-Winham-Davidson vs 4-Hullman-Girouard
480 0.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♦A 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
| 3 |
♠T2
♥KQJ53
♦AKJT
♣A7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 5♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 2.00 0.00 6♥ N ♦6 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Walker-Loops
480 1.00 1.00 4♥ N +2 ♦9 2-Winham-Davidson vs 4-Hullman-Girouard
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣3 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
| 4 |
♠QJ42
♥A953
♦AK4
♣A4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.50 0.50 4♠ S ♣J 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Walker-Loops
620 1.50 0.50 4♠ S ♣2 4-Hullman-Girouard vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦5 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Winham-Davidson
|
| 5 |
♠AJT8743
♥4
♦T864
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♥3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♥ 3NT ♣4 ♦3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 5♥ E -1 ♦A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Walker-Loops
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♦5 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Winham-Davidson
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♦J 4-Hullman-Girouard vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
| 6 |
♠96
♥J9643
♦T2
♣Q832
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦0 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 1♣ 7♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♠ W +3 ♦T 4-Hullman-Girouard vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
690 0.50 1.50 3N W +3 ♥J 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Winham-Davidson
690 0.50 1.50 3N W +3 ♥4 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Walker-Loops
|
| 7 |
♠AJ72
♥AT83
♦T962
♣Q
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 NT4 |
| EW: 5♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ 1/2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ W ♠A 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
120 1.00 1.00 2N E ♠4 4-Hullman-Girouard vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.00 2.00 3♣ E +2 ♥6 7-Walker-Loops vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
| 8 |
♠QJT
♥A3
♦9652
♣Q952
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠4 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N S ♠7 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
50 0.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 ♦K 4-Hullman-Girouard vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 ♦K 7-Walker-Loops vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
| 9 |
♠J7
♥872
♦AT6
♣J8642
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦5/6 ♥6 ♠5/6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♦8 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
200 1.00 1.00 2♥ E -2 ♣K 7-Walker-Loops vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
50 0.00 2.00 3♣ N -1 ♠Q 4-Hullman-Girouard vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 10 |
♠K87
♥A93
♦AQ85
♣982
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦4/5 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 2.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♠7 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ W ♣9 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Winham-Davidson
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ W +2 ♣9 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Hullman-Girouard
|
| 11 |
♠J986
♥Q64
♦A953
♣K5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 2♥ E -2 ♦T 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Hullman-Girouard
100 1.50 0.50 1♥ E -2 ♦T 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Winham-Davidson
230 0.00 2.00 3♠ E +3 ♣K 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 12 |
♠J876542
♥A
♦5
♣AQ32
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/2♣ 2/3♠ ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♣6 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Hullman-Girouard
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N ♥Q 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Winham-Davidson
100 0.00 2.00 3N W -2 ♠4 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 13 |
♠KJ2
♥AJT73
♦QT2
♣A3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 6♦ 5♥ 4♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 1.75 0.25 3N S +3 ♥5 2-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
660 0.25 1.75 3N N +2 ♠7 7-Walker-Loops vs 4-Hullman-Girouard
|
| 14 |
♠63
♥KQ86
♦J876
♣JT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 1.75 0.25 3N E +2 ♠7 2-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
510 0.25 1.75 4♠ E +3 ♣K 7-Walker-Loops vs 4-Hullman-Girouard
|
| 15 |
♠43
♥A53
♦752
♣J9732
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.75 0.25 3♥ W +2 ♠4 7-Walker-Loops vs 4-Hullman-Girouard
420 0.25 1.75 4♥ W ♠4 2-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 16 |
♠AJT653
♥J43
♦J
♣Q74
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦2 ♥6 NT4 |
| EW: 5♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♠9 7-Walker-Loops vs 2-Winham-Davidson
150 0.50 1.50 4♦ W +1 ♠A 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.50 1.50 3♦ W +2 ♠A 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Hullman-Girouard
|
| 17 |
♠Q
♥AQ975
♦A84
♣A832
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣5/4 ♦3 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.00 0.00 1N N +3 ♦K 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ N ♦K 7-Walker-Loops vs 2-Winham-Davidson
90 0.00 2.00 1N S ♠5 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Hullman-Girouard
|
| 18 |
♠J75
♥QJ863
♦JT43
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦J 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Hullman-Girouard
400 0.50 1.50 3N W ♣J 7-Walker-Loops vs 2-Winham-Davidson
400 0.50 1.50 3N E ♣J 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 19 |
♠KJ3
♥T6
♦AQT8
♣A753
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5/6 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 1♥ 3/4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ E +1 ♦6 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 7-Walker-Loops
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 ♣3 2-Winham-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.50 1.50 2♠ E +2 ♥3 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 20 |
♠AT87
♥J982
♦742
♣QJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ S ♠5 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
90 1.00 1.00 1N S ♠4 2-Winham-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.00 2.00 2♣ S -1 ♠2 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 7-Walker-Loops
|
| 21 |
♠-
♥QJ432
♦J532
♣AJ95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5/6 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ E +1 ♥6 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
480 0.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 ♥K 8-Traback-Tidmore vs 7-Walker-Loops
480 0.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 ♦T 2-Winham-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|