| 1 |
♠Q75
♥J64
♦8643
♣A42
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5/6 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ E ♥A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Davidson-Downing
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ E ♥A 8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Erickson-Foy
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ E ♥A 9-Gamble-Spinazze vs 7-Harken-Harken
140 0.13 3.88 2♠ E +1 ♥A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Kobland-Hullman
|
| 2 |
♠K7
♥84
♦Q875
♣AT642
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/-♦ 1♠ ♦7/6 ♥5 NT6/5 |
EW: 2♥ -/1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 2N S +1 ♥7 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Davidson-Downing
140 2.63 1.38 2♠ S +1 ♥7 8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Erickson-Foy
90 1.38 2.63 1N N ♠4 9-Gamble-Spinazze vs 7-Harken-Harken
110 0.13 3.88 2♥ E ♣J 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Kobland-Hullman
|
| 3 |
♠9
♥KQ7
♦KT63
♣QJ984
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦2/3 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.25 0.75 1♠ E +4 ♥A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Kobland-Hullman
200 3.25 0.75 1♠ E +4 ♣7 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Davidson-Downing
650 0.75 3.25 4♠ E +1 ♦7 8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Erickson-Foy
650 0.75 3.25 4♠ E +1 ♣5 9-Gamble-Spinazze vs 7-Harken-Harken
|
| 4 |
♠9
♥AQT54
♦KJT
♣A983
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣3 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 3♥ N -1 ♠A 11-Modest-Winham vs 4-Erickson-Foy
110 2.00 2.00 1♠ E +1 ♥8 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Davidson-Downing
140 0.33 3.67 3♠ E ♥8 1-Kobland-Hullman vs 8-Loops-Walker
|
| 5 |
♠Q8
♥QT2
♦KQ96542
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.67 0.33 2♠ E +1 ♣A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Davidson-Downing
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ E +1 ♦7 11-Modest-Winham vs 4-Erickson-Foy
530 0.33 3.67 3♥* W ♦K 1-Kobland-Hullman vs 8-Loops-Walker
|
| 6 |
♠T72
♥AJ8743
♦KQ8
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠4 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.67 0.33 2♥ N +2 ♣K 1-Kobland-Hullman vs 8-Loops-Walker
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N ♣K 11-Modest-Winham vs 4-Erickson-Foy
100 0.33 3.67 3N W -1 ♠7 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Davidson-Downing
|
| 7 |
♠AT72
♥643
♦AQ84
♣73
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 1.17 2♣ W +3 ♠A 11-Modest-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
150 2.83 1.17 2♣ W +3 ♥6 10-Sterling-Xu vs 8-Loops-Walker
620 0.33 3.67 4♥ W ♣7 2-Davidson-Downing vs 9-Gamble-Spinazze
|
| 8 |
♠AKJ9
♥AKJ7
♦53
♣K93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
70 3.67 0.33 1♣ N ♠3 2-Davidson-Downing vs 9-Gamble-Spinazze
50 1.17 2.83 1♣ N -1 ♠3 10-Sterling-Xu vs 8-Loops-Walker
50 1.17 2.83 1♣ N -1 ♥2 11-Modest-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 9 |
♠AJT9
♥A864
♦5
♣AKT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 3/4♦ 6♥ 2♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.67 0.33 4♥ N +2 ♠3 2-Davidson-Downing vs 9-Gamble-Spinazze
450 1.17 2.83 4♥ N +1 ♠K 10-Sterling-Xu vs 8-Loops-Walker
450 1.17 2.83 4♥ N +1 ♣Q 11-Modest-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 10 |
♠KJ732
♥6
♦KQ5
♣AQJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ -/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6/7 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.25 0.75 2♠ W -3 ♥6 11-Modest-Winham vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
300 3.25 0.75 4♦ W -3 ♥6 10-Sterling-Xu vs 9-Gamble-Spinazze
200 1.38 2.63 2♠ W -2 ♥6 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Erickson-Foy
100 0.13 3.88 2♦ W -1 ♥5 2-Davidson-Downing vs 7-Harken-Harken
|
| 11 |
♠AJ843
♥95
♦982
♣KJT
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 1♠ 4NT ♣6 ♦6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5/4 ♠6/5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 3.88 0.13 3N E -5 ♥A 2-Davidson-Downing vs 7-Harken-Harken
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -2 ♣7 10-Sterling-Xu vs 9-Gamble-Spinazze
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ S -2 ♣A 11-Modest-Winham vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 0.13 3.88 4♥ S -3 ♣A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Erickson-Foy
|
| 12 |
♠93
♥AK8
♦AQT42
♣QT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♠ 5NT ♥6/5 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.25 0.75 3N N +2 ♦9 2-Davidson-Downing vs 7-Harken-Harken
660 3.25 0.75 3N N +2 ♣6 10-Sterling-Xu vs 9-Gamble-Spinazze
630 1.38 2.63 3N N +1 ♥3 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Erickson-Foy
600 0.13 3.88 3N N ♥3 11-Modest-Winham vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 13 |
♠5
♥T9853
♦K76
♣KJ92
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2/1♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.88 0.13 3N S ♠6 7-Harken-Harken vs 11-Modest-Winham
100 2.63 1.38 4♥ N -1 ♠4 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.38 2.63 3N S -2 ♠7 1-Kobland-Hullman vs 10-Sterling-Xu
400 0.13 3.88 2N S -4 ♠8 9-Gamble-Spinazze vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 14 |
♠K873
♥74
♦KQ872
♣32
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ -/1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 6♥ E -2 ♣5 9-Gamble-Spinazze vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣9 1-Kobland-Hullman vs 10-Sterling-Xu
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣4 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 0.13 3.88 4♥ E +1 ♠J 7-Harken-Harken vs 11-Modest-Winham
|
| 15 |
♠A
♥JT763
♦Q6543
♣KQ
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.67 0.33 3N E -1 ♥9 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
120 2.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♥2 1-Kobland-Hullman vs 10-Sterling-Xu
420 0.33 3.67 4♠ E ♦A 7-Harken-Harken vs 11-Modest-Winham
|
| 16 |
♠J6
♥Q73
♦AJ532
♣K63
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 1N E -2 ♥J 8-Loops-Walker vs 11-Modest-Winham
120 3.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♦5 1-Kobland-Hullman vs 7-Harken-Harken
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ S -1 ♥2 2-Davidson-Downing vs 10-Sterling-Xu
50 1.50 2.50 3♣ N -1 ♥3 4-Erickson-Foy vs 9-Gamble-Spinazze
120 0.00 4.00 1N E +1 ♠9 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 17 |
♠J97
♥AT92
♦KJ
♣A976
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 3♠ -/2NT ♥6 NT6/8 |
EW: -/1♥ ♣2 ♦4/5 ♥6/7 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -4 ♣8 1-Kobland-Hullman vs 7-Harken-Harken
150 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -3 ♣2 4-Erickson-Foy vs 9-Gamble-Spinazze
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -2 ♦A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ E ♣2 8-Loops-Walker vs 11-Modest-Winham
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ E ♣2 2-Davidson-Downing vs 10-Sterling-Xu
|
| 18 |
♠KJ42
♥AKQ5
♦JT8
♣J2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ W ♥A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 2.00 2.00 3♣ W +2 ♥A 2-Davidson-Downing vs 10-Sterling-Xu
150 2.00 2.00 3♣ W +2 ♥A 4-Erickson-Foy vs 9-Gamble-Spinazze
150 2.00 2.00 2♣ E +3 ♥A 8-Loops-Walker vs 11-Modest-Winham
300 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -3 ♣A 1-Kobland-Hullman vs 7-Harken-Harken
|
| 19 |
♠76543
♥7
♦T964
♣A83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♠7 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Erickson-Foy
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♠7 11-Modest-Winham vs 9-Gamble-Spinazze
600 1.50 2.50 3N W ♠7 2-Davidson-Downing vs 8-Loops-Walker
600 1.50 2.50 3N W ♦9 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Harken-Harken
630 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♠4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Kobland-Hullman
|
| 20 |
♠KJ874
♥QJT752
♦A
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 2♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣0 ♦5 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 4.00 0.00 6N S +1 ♦J 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Kobland-Hullman
710 3.00 1.00 5♥ N +2 ♥3 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Erickson-Foy
620 2.00 2.00 5♣ S +1 ♦J 2-Davidson-Downing vs 8-Loops-Walker
100 0.50 3.50 6N S -1 ♦J 11-Modest-Winham vs 9-Gamble-Spinazze
100 0.50 3.50 6♥ N -1 ♠A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Harken-Harken
|
| 21 |
♠Q95
♥AT5
♦AKQT832
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♦ 6♥ 5♠ 5NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦0 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 4.00 0.00 3N S +4 ♣7 2-Davidson-Downing vs 8-Loops-Walker
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♣A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Kobland-Hullman
620 2.00 2.00 5♦ N +1 ♣2 11-Modest-Winham vs 9-Gamble-Spinazze
170 1.00 3.00 3♦ N +3 ♣8 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Harken-Harken
100 0.00 4.00 5♦ N -1 ♣8 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Erickson-Foy
|
| 22 |
♠K962
♥Q9
♦KQT65
♣K7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3/4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 3♦ N ♠Q 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Davidson-Downing
100 2.63 1.38 2♠ W -1 ♥Q 11-Modest-Winham vs 1-Kobland-Hullman
50 1.38 2.63 3N N -1 ♠Q 10-Sterling-Xu vs 4-Erickson-Foy
80 0.13 3.88 1♠ W ♦K 7-Harken-Harken vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 23 |
♠Q4
♥A86
♦95
♣KQT943
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.88 0.13 3♠ W -5 ♣K 7-Harken-Harken vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 2.00 4♦ E -1 ♣8 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Davidson-Downing
100 2.00 2.00 4♦ E -1 ♣8 10-Sterling-Xu vs 4-Erickson-Foy
110 0.13 3.88 2♦ E +1 ♣8 11-Modest-Winham vs 1-Kobland-Hullman
|
| 24 |
♠A9754
♥K8
♦T985
♣T2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦6/5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.88 0.13 5♠* W -3 ♥8 10-Sterling-Xu vs 4-Erickson-Foy
150 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -3 ♣T 11-Modest-Winham vs 1-Kobland-Hullman
150 2.00 2.00 4♥ E -3 ♣A 7-Harken-Harken vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.13 3.88 5♣* S -1 ♥A 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Davidson-Downing
|
| 25 |
♠94
♥KQ82
♦JT653
♣87
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.67 0.33 1N E ♣6 8-Loops-Walker vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
120 1.17 2.83 2N W ♣8 4-Erickson-Foy vs 1-Kobland-Hullman
120 1.17 2.83 2N E ♣6 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Sterling-Xu
|
| 26 |
♠J5
♥A5
♦AKJT872
♣T7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♦ 1♠ 5NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 1.17 3♦ N +3 ♥K 4-Erickson-Foy vs 1-Kobland-Hullman
170 2.83 1.17 3♦ N +3 ♥K 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Sterling-Xu
100 0.33 3.67 3♥ E -1 ♣A 8-Loops-Walker vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 27 |
♠Q4
♥JT854
♦63
♣AJ85
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
240 3.67 0.33 2N S +4 ♠5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Sterling-Xu
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ N +2 ♠2 8-Loops-Walker vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 0.33 3.67 2N S +1 ♠5 4-Erickson-Foy vs 1-Kobland-Hullman
|